GearHeads Corner

Dan:

  Excellent, let us know how it works out. :)

Art

hi art I have gone back to the dev version of gearotic I could not get anything useful out of the version you sent me with out being 100 mm plus deep I played for quite a long time everything I tried somethings helped some not.

I think the problem is the webcam I am using compered to what you have mines a Genius FaceCam 1020.

I have it set to 640 x 480 YUY2
250ms
Confidence is around 100
Gradient Scale 1.50
pedestal closure ticked (what ever it for)

pick attached I got a new program for the web cam I have and can zoom in and pan with it.

so it is better than any other program for scanning I have now

Dan:

If you get a chance, could you zip up a 4set of shots saved from the screen? Id like to
experiment with your data in the new code. Pulling out too far is an odd one.. Id like to see
if I can make any adjustments to allow a camera such as yours to me a bit more muted
for the release of the new code in the fall..

Thx
Art

will do soon

Hi art lost the new version of the scanner you sent me would the picks taken with the dev version be ok if not can you send me the file again

ta
Daniel

Hi Dan:

  Any 4 pics will do, that section never changed, I just wanted to see data with such a high confidence rating.. ( 100 is pretty
huge, I get 30 or so typically.. ). :)

Art

ok I will do a set, white back ground, black background, mdf back ground and no back ground the endless background did not help

Dan

  Thx,. no rush. I wont touch the 3d code now till the fall , Ill clean it up a bit then before the
first release on the next development year. I really just want to analyse the numbers to see
just how powerfull your gradient fields are , and to see if I can put in code to fix that when a person
is lucky enough to have that good a setup.

Thx
Art

the set up is diy wast materials and bits what where laying around you could do the same with a dead microwave it`s just a box with a door