GearHeads Corner
April 20, 2021, 07:25:44 AM
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Home
Help
Search
Login
Register
GearHeads Corner
>
General Category
>
Support and Bug Reports
>
Deadbeat Escapement Problem
Pages: [
1
]
« previous
next »
Print
Author
Topic: Deadbeat Escapement Problem (Read 525 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
PRundle
Newbie
Posts: 8
Deadbeat Escapement Problem
«
on:
July 13, 2020, 04:22:04 AM »
I'm trying to relate a simulatii
on to a real life situation but am having problems.
Whichever parameter I change (drop lock angles etc) the pendulum swing stays at +/- 1.5 deg.
When I simulate the rotationa
l angle changes from about -4.4 to about 1.4, again not changing with a change of parameter
s. This suggests that the total swing is 5.8 deg or +/- 2.9 deg?
I am trying to simulate a design where the escape wheel is 47.62mm diameter, and the actual pendulum swing is +/- 1.6 deg at most.
I think must be missing something? Any suggestio
ns?
Pat
Logged
ArtF
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5744
Re: Deadbeat Escapement Problem
«
Reply #1 on:
July 13, 2020, 08:11:44 AM »
Hi Pat:
Its been awhile since Ive dealt with swing mechanics so I took a look at the code
to make sure of how that works.
The formula for the swing of a pendulum ( theoretic
al swing, actual will depend on
the setup of its beat and weight..) is, in a recoil escapemen
t...
((PI / Teeth) - (DropAngle + TipAngle)) /2;
However, in looking at the code I see the in the walker escapemen
t, the formula used for the
pendulum sing in simulatio
n is simply
(PI / Teeth) / 2;
The recoil was developed after the graham as I recall, and Im wondering if whatever horologic
al
tables I used simplifie
d this equation of the swing. Im thinking the dropand tip angles should
have been included in this escapemen
t as well. Normally you have only the tooth count, the lock
and drop to set swing with, so with the walkers simplifie
d display of angle its hard to be as exact as you wish.
I will fix this in future once I convince myself this is an error and not a differenc
e between the two.
hmm, as I investiga
te it becomes clear the walker seems wrong. I tested a modificat
ion and the angle seems
more correct in this version. I will have to give it some thought before making it an official fix.
Please send me a note to me at support @gearoric.com and I will send you a temporary version
that corrects this display in walker, the drop and tip relief now adjust the calculate
d swing
response.
Thx
Art
Logged
Pages: [
1
]
Print
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
General Category
-----------------------------
=> Newest Rev Release
=> Virus Warnings
=> Bevel Machining Discussions
=> Registered Users
=> Gear Discussions
=> Vexx Support
=> Support and Bug Reports
=> Suggestions for Future
=> Third Party Software
=> 3d Printers Discussion
=> Conventional Gear Cutting forum
=> 3D Printer Examples
=> Tickers
=> Mechs and Kinematics
=> Arduino Laser Control
=> Auggie: Augmented Machine Controller
=> Laser Stories
=> C Scripting - 101
=> CNC Machine mechanical questions
=> ClockMakers
-----------------------------
User Video Links
-----------------------------
=> WebCam experience
=> User Photo's ( Show and Tell)
=> Your Videos
-----------------------------
To Join Forum, please email Support@gearotic.com
-----------------------------
=> To Join This group, please email support@gearotic.com
Loading...